Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Full Paper Panel
We propose a panel of papers that use formal theory to explore different aspects of the judicial system, including: 1) the nature of facts versus law in appellate judicial decision making; 2) the role of strategic litigants in the judicial system; 3) racial bias in civilian-police interactions; and 4) accountability and roll-call voting on judicial nominees.
Hard Cases Make Bad Law? A Theoretical Investigation - Sepehr Shahshahani, Princeton University
Litigants and the Judicial Hierarchy - Ryan Hubert, University of California, Davis
Are Police Racially Biased in the Decision to Shoot? - Tom Clark, Emory University
Legislative Bench-Marking: A Theory of Accountability and Roll-Call Voting - Charles M. Cameron, Princeton University; John P. Kastellec, Princeton University