Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Full Paper Panel
The dominant "master theory" among American political scientists over the past few decades views the behavior of individuals and groups, including political parties, as the result of individuals acting on the basis of ideal preference points. These preference points are typically conceived of as existing, and moving within, a static, ideological spatial spectrum. This theory has been frequently used, in particular, in explaining party polarization and gridlock in American politics. The papers on this panel both follow and challenge this "master theory," and explore the complex relationships between parties and ideologies in American politics.
Parties, Pivots and Roll-Call Votes in Congress, 1887-2016 - John H. Aldrich, Duke University; Michelle Whyman, Duke University
An Ideological Turing Test: Delegates’ Understanding of Their Opponents - Hans Noel, Georgetown University
The Long Tail of Never Trump - Steven M. Teles; Robert P. Saldin, University of Montana
Are American Political Parties Resilient? Campaign Finance Party Networks - Jennifer Nicoll Victor, George Mason University