Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Full Paper Panel
In recent years legislative oversight of executive behavior has become a key topic of popular and media concern on both sides of the Atlantic. For instance, how far can and should congressional committees demand oversight of the Presidency? How can Parliament best scrutinize the executive while it is conducting Brexit negotiations? How can legislatures do so in an era of ‘fake news’ and ‘post-truth’ politics? Similarly, questions about the limits of executive power have also come to the fore. How untouchable is the convention that the executive should control the British parliamentary timetable? Does the US President have the power to issue executive orders to implement policy when frustrated by Congress legislatively? This panel puts executive-legislature relations in comparative perspective by examining the recent experience of the US Congress and the UK Parliament.
Questioning Scrutiny: The Effect of Question Time on Citizen Efficacy and Trust in Government - Alan Convery, University of Edinburgh; David CW Parker, Montana State University, Bozeman; Pavielle Haines, University of Denver
Scenes of Scrutiny: How Evidence Practices Shape Oversight Capacity in the UK House of Commons - Marc Geddes, University of Edinburgh
Agency Independence and Compliance with Administrative Procedures: (Not) Providing Information under the Congressional Review Act - Jennifer L. Selin, University of Missouri, Columbia
Well Advised or Politically Informed? How Congress Directs Program Evaluation and Oversight - Cody Drolc, University of Missouri
Promoting Parliamentary Oversight through Mini-Publics: An Analysis of UK Cases - Stephen Elstub, Newcastle University