Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences
Sign In
X (Twitter)
We analyze the conditions under which internal conflict can promote or impede state development, taking imperial China as a laboratory. We develop a novel theoretical framework in which local elites and the central state interact over the provision of internal security. Using new micro-level data across more than half a millennium, we show evidence that, traditionally, the central state improved its monopoly over violence in response to mass rebellion. The mid-nineteenth century marked the start of a new geopolitical era in China, when the central state’s costs of military defense rose greatly. In turn, we find evidence for a shift in leadership toward local elites in response to internal conflict. This change reduced the central state’s monopoly over violence and promoted state failure. Our study shows how the relationship between internal conflict and state development depends on the cost conditions for a given geopolitical context.