Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Many worry that uncivil discourse can undermine democratic processes. Yet, what exactly does it mean for discourse to be uncivil? I argue that there is systematic variation in perceptions of incivility based on the target of the speech. Specifically, I show—via a conjoint survey experiment—that White Americans are less likely to view statements directed at Blacks as uncivil but more likely to perceive incivility when the target is a woman or a co-partisan. The results have implications not only for understanding incivility (and the problem with making broad statements about it) but also for the impact of identity on political communication norms.