Expanding Noncitizen Voting Rights during Dictatorship: An Extreme Case

• In Event: Migration in and from the Global South

Abstract

Fear, terror, and control are words used to discuss dictatorship, whereas inclusion, participation, and freedom parallel democracy. While survival of social and political rights is unusual in dictatorship, granting more voting rights is bizarre, especially at a time without elections. An early adopter of local-level immigrant suffrage in 1925, Chile expanded noncitizen residents’ rights to national-level elections in the 1980 Constitution. How and why did a military dictatorship expand immigrant voting rights? Building on existent literature and data, I conduct content analysis of the written dialog from the 1974 Ortúzar Commission during constitutional revision, as well as historical archival research in Chile. I argue that political co-optation, control, and the immigrant population size fail to explain immigrant voting rights’ survival and extension through shifting (non-)democratic regimes. This extreme case of migrant enfranchisement in Chile reveals the importance of both path dependence and powerful elites’ divided opinions on optional versus obligatory voting for noncitizen residents versus citizens.

Author

• Victoria Finn, European University Institute