Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Recent literature on fake news identifies the types of individuals most likely to spread fake news across social media platforms. However, while previous research has shown who is sharing fake news, it has much less to say about who is most vulnerable to it. In this paper, we investigate whether or not individuals can consistently discern fake from genuine news and, if they can, what individual factors predict skill at this task. Specifically we examine the individual-level characteristics associated with correctly identifying fake news. We present results from a 7-week panel survey in which individuals evaluate fake and genuine news stories within 24 hours of their publication online. Importantly, we find respondents generally fail to correctly identify fake news, although performance varies within different demographic groups. Among other findings, our research also shows that asking respondents to seek outside evidence when evaluating veracity of news in fact makes them more susceptible to fake news. Additionally, we find that those with high digital literacy and those who are frequent consumers of news are least susceptible to fake news. Finally, in line with current theories, the ideology of individuals can explain variation in fake news vulnerability as well.
Kevin Aslett, New York University
William P Godel, New York University
Nathaniel Persily, Stanford University
Zeve Sanderson, New York University
Joshua A. Tucker, New York University
Jonathan Nagler, New York University
Richard Bonneau, NYU