Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A substantial tradition in the civil-military relations literature takes as given the salience of professional norms in the military, among them a commitment to democratic values, aversion to partisan politics, and relatively inflexible organizational ethics. However, few empirical efforts have kept pace with measuring these normative claims amidst ongoing concerns of military politicization, ethical standards, and civilian intervention in organizational affairs long considered the territory of military leaders. In this study, we use an original survey battery to measure the strength and salience of civil-military norms amongst junior prospective officers at the military academy; in the midst of their socialization to civil-military values, we can consider this the upper bound of where norms might be strongest, if indeed they are significant at all. In addition, we use an embedded list experiment to measure true preferences to controversial questions in civil-military affairs, such as the competing loyalties to subordinates, leaders, and democratic governance.
Risa A. Brooks, Marquette University
Heidi Urben, Georgetown University
Michael Robinson, United States Military Academy