Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Coalition Bargaining in the United States Congress

Thu, September 10, 12:00 to 1:30pm MDT (12:00 to 1:30pm MDT), TBA

Abstract

In the US House of Representatives, the position of committee chair is considered to be enormously powerful. Given the power afforded a committee chair to control a particular policy domain, it is no surprise that leadership of a House committee is a highly sought after position. The existent literature argues that, since the early 20th century, committee chairmanship has been almost exclusively determined by seniority. As it happens, when a chair becomes vacant, there are frequently multiple committee members with the same seniority that could become committee chair under a seniority rule. We argue that these “ties” in seniority present an opportunity for party leaders to strengthen their party in much the same way that leaders in parliamentary systems build and maintain coalitions. We show that even though seniority plays a role, party leaders use committee chairmanships as a tool to build and maintain coalitions of factions that makeup congressional parties. Using data on committee leadership, we show how changes in committee chairs may reflect renegotiations among factions within the majority party. Furthermore, we combine committee chairmanship data with data on committee outcomes to show how changes in committee control change committee p olicy production.

Authors