Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Relevance, Quality, and Expedience: Political Science Responds to COVID-19: Comparing and Explaining Policy Reactions and Political Consequences

Thu, September 10, 10:00 to 11:30am MDT (10:00 to 11:30am MDT), TBA

Session Submission Type: Created Panel

Session Description

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed an unprecedented shock to democratic political systems, but the manner in which democracies have responded have been markedly different. This panel includes papers that seek to explain how institutional and political factors have shaped the way in which the crisis has been defined and handled by governments; that explain how democratic publics have responded to crisis measures; and that inquire into the short-term and longer-term consequences of crisis politics for the quality of democracy. Paper 1 focuses on the explanatory power of the federal versus unitary distinction in explaining public policy responses to the crisis. Paper 2 focuses on the politics of social distancing and asks how people have complied with lockdown politics. Paper 3 examines how crisis politics have affected trust in government across a range of European and North democracies. Paper 4 assesses the democratic implications of public health measures against COVID-19 for 30 established democracies.

All four papers that make up the panel draw on original data that has been collected since the onset of the pandemic; have a strong comparative orientation; and involve teams of authors with senior and early career scholars. The papers will form part of a special issue of the journal West European Politics that is expected to be published in the spring of 2021.

Sub Unit

Individual Presentations

Chair

Discussants