Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Literature on gatekeeping in women's political advancement has primarily examined the role of political parties in understanding women's persistently low descriptive representation. In this paper, I examine a particularly understudied institution that is central to policy implementation: the bureaucracy. I argue that how bureaucrats react to the entry of new groups, particularly those that are perceived as inexperienced and ill-prepared to lead, is essential to understanding when minorities are successful. Using survey data from 252 bureaucrats in the state of Telangana, India, I show that bureaucrats who directly work with grassroots politicians have negative biases—both implicit and explicit—about women's effectiveness as leaders. I combine this data with survey and network analysis data from over 1,000 village-level politicians to show that women face bureaucratic discretion, and are unable to overcome it due to limited networks. This paper elucidates how an oft-understudied institution in gatekeeping, the bureaucracy, can have consequential effects for women ability to govern in their constituencies.