Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Why is the study of International Relations not global? The study of IR is gaining popularity around the world. Sociological analyses have shown that IR is increasingly studied in various parts of the world. Still, North America and particularly the US remain the dominant center for establishing and developing the field’s theories, curriculum, methodology, scholarship and institutions. So far very few studies have focused on broadening, diversifying, and globalizing the study of IR. This article begins to fill this gap. We advance the hypothesis that teaching and practice of International relations very much depend on cultural contexts. In an analysis of the IR curriculum and in 4 countries (Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and the US) between 2018 and 2020, employing content analysis, surveys, and in-depth interviews with scholars, students, and practitioners of IR, we demonstrate to what extent IR is perceived differently in North America, Middle East and post-Soviet area. A global view of IR is needed for our knowledge about world politics to capture the perspectives of those in the global South as well as the global North – and in between.