Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Since the 1990s, all over Latin America governments have introduced important reforms to transition towards an accusatorial (or adversarial) model of criminal justice. Among many other changes, these reforms aim to improve “procedural justice”, that is: fairness in how decisions are made. For many decades, research conducted in developed countries has suggested that quality of treatment is more important than outcomes for how fair the criminal justice system is perceived and for overall institutional legitimacy. Furthermore, it has been widely assumed that adversarial systems tend to increase perceptions of fairness when compared to inquisitorial systems. But, has that been the case in the context of Latin America? To this day it remains an overdue task to learn if the transition towards an adversarial system has had an impact on the perceptions of procedural justice among defendants. Using survey data, in this paper I will provide preliminary findings from a project that aims to learn how inmates perceive procedural justice in four countries in Central America.