Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In response to the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Union has launched one of the most massive assistance package in EU history, where all 27 EU member states are asked to jointly borrow a staggering 500 billion Euros to finance grants to areas hardest hit by the crises. Despite the unprecedented size of this package, we know less about citizens support for such common EU response to the crises. Using unique data from a large online survey including all 27 EU member states conducted between October and Decemeber in 2020 (n=60,000), this study investigates the degree to which citizens prefer an EU response to the crisis compared with an exclusively national one. Our theoretical framework builds on various sets of expectations from the growing literature on public support for international aid, in particular within the EU - namely the effect of elite cues, utilitarian concerns, geographic attachment and perceptions of institutions. Using experimental and observational data we test a number of theoretical expectations to better understand patterns of mass support – or scepticism – for EU economic integration in times of crisis.