Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How does the entrenchment of elected politicians affect the incentives and selection of bureaucrats? We examine this question both theoretically and empirically. We develop an accountability model between an elected politician and a bureaucrat in which an election occurs after the first period, introducing possible turnover of the incumbent politician. In this framework, entrenchment refers to the likelihood that the incumbent wins the election to stay in power into the second period. We derive two predictions that we test empirically. First, as the incumbent's entrenchment increases, the bureaucrat exerts more effort, improving performance. Second, the entrenchment of the incumbent has a non-monotonic effect on selection of high quality bureaucrats. We test these implications in the context of Brazilian municipal government. We measure entrenchment in terms of the strength of political dynasties in municipal administration. We then use school performance data and rich personnel data on school administrators and teachers to measure bureaucratic performance and quality, respectively, to test these predictions. Our study provides insights into the dynamic effects of political turnover on public goods provision and bureaucratic quality.