Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
There is extant literature documenting the unequal representation of the interests of economically defined groups. One explanation for this phenomenon resides in the electoral behavior of different groups of voters: If the more affluent base their vote decision more strongly on policy considerations while the less affluent rely on more unconditional forms of electoral support, this pattern could influence the ability of political elites to represent the poor as well as their willingness to do so as the accountability mechanisms might be less at play. We make use of the integrated CSES to study how income affects the way in which voters rely on different voting heuristics like proximity voting, valence considerations and economic voting across a diverse set of countries. Our findings suggest that these different heuristics are used to similar extents by all income groups. The more affluent base their vote decision slightly more strongly on their policy preferences, less affluent put slightly more weight on partisanship and in general their electoral decision making is not as well explained as the choices of the rich. However, substantively these differences are very small and could hardly explain a systematic underrepresentation of the policy preferences of the poor.