Wrecking the Public Sphere: New-Authoritarians’ Attacks on Pluralism and Truth

• In Event: Pluralism as a Democratic Commitment

Abstract

The public sphere performs two important functions in democracy. The first is to facilitate the circulation of information used by citizens to form their opinions and take positions on public matters. The second function is as an agent of democratic accountability by facilitating pluralistic debate, criticism, challenge, and contestation. The new-authoritarians - which we define as a group, leader, or party that seeks to promote authoritarian, autocratic, or patrimonial regimes within the framework of constitutional democracy - take aim at the public sphere to attempt to destroy its ability to perform these functions. Although many tactics are used there are two general strategies. The first is to undermine trust in facts and create conditions in which disinformation circulates easily and effectively. The second is to undermine the power of criticism and dissent especially on the part of the press and minority opposition voices. In this way, new-authoritarians can claim to be staunch defenders of democracy (because they enthusiastically embrace elections and voting) at the same time as attacking what makes elections and voting democratic in the first place.

Authors

• Simone Chambers, University of California, Irvine

• Jeffrey Kopstein, University of California, Irvine