Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The negativity bias theory contends that people pay more attention to negative than to positive information. It is argued that the bias is a consequence of risk-aversion that developed through evolution and is therefore a part of human nature. In this paper, I challenge this claim, by emphasizing the relevance of cultural values in understanding the presence and strength of the negativity bias. Using data from the World Value Survey, I demonstrate that negativity in political decision-making is prevalent in the Western context (Europe, Oceania and America), but no such phenomenon is observed in Asia and Africa. To explain this discrepancy, I focus on the East Asian case and explore how regional cultural heritage may impact citizens’ cognitive bias towards negativity. An analysis of the Asian Barometer data shows that Confucianist values significantly reduce people’s negativity in their approach to the social environment. Individuals who score higher on traditional values are more likely to trust other people and the government, and to rate the economic and safety situations as satisfactory. In addition, I find that Confucianism moderates how citizens resort to negative and positive government performance considerations when they express regime support. Negativity has a significantly smaller impact on regime support among individuals who are more attached to Confucianist values. These results question the generalizability of judgment asymmetry outside the Western context, and advocate for an inclusion of cultural variables in future studies on the topic.