Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Recent work in political psychology has focused on personality traits of both elites and masses to explain a wide variety of political behavior. With some notable exceptions, much of this research has been conducted using survey methods, which raises important questions of political bias in the responses, especially among members of the mass public who may have less personal knowledge of the personality traits of elites. Using a novel survey of former members of the United States House of Representatives, we show that, despite the possession of greater levels of personal knowledge of the personality traits of the subjects, the severing of the electoral connection, and the lack of institutional party pressure, partisan differences persist in how Congressional leaders are rated on their Big Five personality traits. These results raise questions about the utility of using direct surveys to elicit personality measurements of potentially divisive political actors.