Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
We consider a dynamic model of vote-buying in which local brokers must invest in political networks over the life of a business cycle, without knowing if the clientelistic party will commit to using said networks and hence providing them with rents at the time of the election. We show that economies characterized by long boom periods will actually have greater levels of clientelism, as this relaxes the commitment problem for the party in power. These economies with long periods of economic persistence may appear to see shifts to general interest policies for a time (e.g., the Peronists in Argentina), but will also be likely to revert to clientelism when the economy is stabilized. The fixed costs for rebuilding fallow networks will have a non-monotonic effect on clientelism, as low fixed costs create a commitment problem for brokers, but sufficiently high fixed costs guarantee that clientelism will eventually be broken for good.