Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Political outcomes ranging from mass migration to leadership change to violent conflict have been linked to adverse climatic conditions expected to increase under climate change. While large scale cross-country panel datasets can provide substantiation of such relationships, relatively little rigorous evidence is available to identify micro-level behavioral and collective responses that could help to explain these links. In this study we pair an exogenous climatic shock: a severe and spatially-varying drought, with repeated “lab-in-the-field” behavioral games and observed measures of collective action from 123 grazing areas across northern Namibia. First, we test whether play by over 1,200 individuals in public goods and third-party punishment games differs between drought and non-drought conditions. Second, we employ a difference-in-differences strategy to determine whether the size of any behavioral change varies with the local severity of the drought and related ecological stress. Third, in the same villages, we explore how observed measures of collective behavior—including participation in community groups, meetings and financial contributions regarding water resource and rangeland management—vary with the experience of drought. Results (TBD) will provide some of the first evidence from a context of acute vulnerability to climate change of the impacts of severe climatic shocks on people’s propensity to act pro-socially and collectively. These will, in turn, further elucidate potential mechanisms linking climate to political outcomes from migration to conflict.