Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Virtual Roundtable
Problems of observability have impeded theory-building within the Political Violence subfield, whether concerning ‘invisible’ internal coups, measuring degrees of repression, or observational equivalences that arise from obscurity around micro-level behaviours. Variables, concepts and processes may be (and are often) endogenous in ways that are unclear due to such obstacles in observation and measurement, which may also problematize existing causal arguments focused on more immediately observable concepts and phenomena.
To this point of motivation and echoing the conference theme of ‘Pluralism’, this proposed panel brings together scholars championing diverse, innovative measures to resolve problems of observability, such as affective analysis, latent variable models, and by identifying creative exogenous variables. This panel aims to discuss methodological pluralism not only between extant Political Science methods, but ways to ‘import’ and encourage methodological cross-fertilization between social sciences and humanities to determine that we are indeed studying what we say we are studying.
Kanisha Bond Binghamton University
Courtenay R. Conrad University of California, Merced
Christopher J. Fariss University of Michigan
Emily Hencken Ritter Vanderbilt University
Livia Isabella Schubiger Duke University
Yael Zeira Syracuse University