Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: In-Person Full Paper Panel
This panel explores the effects of credit claiming on who has access to resources, how citizens respond to policies, and citizen electoral behavior. One of the central questions when politicians provide resources is, who will benefit most from these decisions? In this panel, we have four papers that approach questions of credit claiming for understanding both policy and electoral outcomes. We explore (1) how the ability to claim credit affects what resources are provided (2) how community-driven programs can influence compliance with health measures in contexts with high levels of political capture (3) how the ability to claim credit for attracting foreign aid affects electability and (4) how credit claiming behavior affects citizens evaluations of politicians in future electoral cycles. Together, these papers extend the study of credit claiming to ask both when and why credit claiming is important for outcomes.
Petitioning Patrons: Community Claims and Political Responsiveness in Urban India - Adam Michael Auerbach, American University-SIS; Tariq Thachil, University of Pennsylvania
Can We Work Together? Evidence from an Experiment in Slum Settlements in Brazil - Natalia Salgado Bueno, Emory University; George Avelino, FGV-SP; Ciro Biderman
Voter Preferences and Foreign Aid: Experimental Evidence from Pakistan - Syeda ShahBano Ijaz, UC San Diego
Who Gets Credit? Citizen Responses to Local Public Goods - Katherine Marie McKiernan, Tulane University