Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Virtual Created Panel
What we think we know about the nature of judicial politics and behavior is tied to conceptualization and measurement choices, and assumptions made by researchers shape and influence both processes. This panel contributes to conversations surrounding these fundamental research steps and includes papers exploring measurements of case salience, agenda change, judicial ideology, and judicial outcomes across various courts.
Case Salience in the State Supreme Courts: An Update - Teena Wilhelm; Richard L. Vining, University of Georgia
Measuring Agenda Change at the Supreme Court - Ben Johnson, Penn State Law; Logan Strother, Purdue University
Measuring Judicial Policy Preferences Using Case Facts - JBrandon Duck-Mayr, Washington University in St. Louis
Winning and Losing at the Federal District Courts - Madison Shanks, University of South Carolina