Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Scholars have shown that civilian support is crucial to the success of armed groups, but do not theorize where this support comes from. Extending this literature, I argue that the legacy of trauma predicts civilian behavior -- both individual and collective -- in providing aid to warmakers in a subsequent conflict. I test this argument by estimating the effect of the Holodomor, a 1930s starvation in Ukraine enforced by Soviet Russia, on noncombatant mobilization in the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Using original data, I show that in districts where the Holodomor losses were greater there is more community and individual level support for the Ukrainian military in its current conflict with Russia. These districts have created more organizations that provide wartime aid to the Ukrainian military and civilians in these districts also contribute more individually than is the case in districts with fewer Holodomor losses. My findings suggest that historical trauma encourages noncombatant participation in warmaking generations later.