Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How do the distributive stakes for businesses impact public attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies? Americans across the political spectrum are increasingly antagonistic towards large corporations, and one leading account of climate change mitigation policy is that larger firms may benefit from climate regulation due to an anti-competitive effect on small and medium-sized firms. I hypothesize that individuals who harbor unfavorable opinions of large corporations and perceive climate policies – particularly regulations to mitigate climate change – as disproportionately benefiting large corporations will be less likely to support climate change mitigation policies. To test this theory, I conduct a survey experiment to determine the effects of informing citizens that large corporations benefit from climate policies on their attitudes towards the adoption of climate policies. I examine this normative mechanism alongside a material mechanism emphasizing job risk. This work contributes to the literature on moral political economy, and on the enduring difficulty of enacting effective climate change legislation within the United States.