Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How do police respond to judicial decisions? In this article, we investigate the effect of judicial decisions on the use of force by U.S. police officers. We focus on the extent to which restrictive and permissive court rulings regarding the use of electronic control devices (ECDs)—colloquially known as TASERs—make officers more hesitant to use excessive force. To test the implications of our theory, we take advantage of variance in United States Courts of Appeals rulings on the extent to which ECDs constitute excessive use-of-force in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Courtenay R. Conrad, University of California, Merced
Kristine Eck, Uppsala University
Sophia Hatz, Department of Peace and Conflict Research