Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper presents the first evidence of systematic ethnic and geographical discrimination in Artificial Intelligence (AI) used to assist judges in criminal sentencing in the People's Republic of China. Using an audit experiment on a commercial criminal sentencing software, I show that, on average, defendants with minority-sounding names and from ethnically diverse regions get predicted sentences that are 5 percent longer than Han defendants who have committed the exact same crimes. Ethnic and geographical factors each contributes independently to this discriminating effect. These findings hold across multiple ethnic groups, regions, and crimes. In addition to the main result, I show that the use of AI introduces new forms of discrimination not seen in human data.