Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Although dominant parties are conducive to preventing autocratic breakdown, recent studies also suggest that party-based dictatorships may also collapse through elite divisions generated by political appointments and decisions on rent distribution. This article explores the conditions under which elite divisions lead to regime change in party-based dictatorships. We argue that whether elite divisions lead to regime collapse depends upon the historical origins of ruling parties. Using the V-Party dataset, we show that elite divisions within the ruling party decrease the levels of democratization and the risk of authoritarian breakdown when ruling parties originate from ideology-based conflicts. Findings suggest that dictators can use strong partisan ties to maintain elite cohesion among loyalists and legitimize the use of repressive measures to deal with defectors even if elite divisions occur. Consequently, elite divisions fail to credibly challenge the government and make it difficult for opposition figures and activists to effectively rally against the extant regime.