Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Conventional political economy models assume that the poor favor redistribution while the rich dislike it. But income does not explain two puzzles in advanced democracies: The poor do not always demand redistribution, and the rich do not always oppose it. Scholars have used nationalism to explain both puzzles. Some, focusing on the former, argue that nationalism tends to reduce support for redistribution, and it affects the poor most since it is common among the poor and not among the rich. Others, addressing the latter, argue that nationalism can increase the rich’s support for redistribution. I join this debate by examining two questions with a focus on advanced democracies: Is nationalism more common among poorer individuals? How does nationalism affect the redistributive preferences of different income groups? Using individual-level data from three cross-national surveys and a panel study from Britain, I find that the poor are not more nationalistic than the rich, and that nationalism can reduce the support for redistribution of both the rich and the poor.