Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Voters in the United States cast ballots for individual candidates, not bundles of policies or political parties. It is therefore important to understand how Americans consider candidates' personal traits, relative to their issue positions and partisanship, when voting. Using a conjoint survey experiment, I examine the weights voters place on issues, party, and personal qualities in mock elections. Beyond this evaluation of marginal effects on candidate support, I use this design to study the relationship between issue proximity and valence in voting. I find evidence, in line with standard modeling assumptions, that voters weigh personal traits less heavily the larger the issue advantage one candidate holds over the other and that this finding extends to trade offs between partisanship and personal quality. These findings have implications for our understanding of the role of personal traits in elections and how we should consider them when evaluating candidate performance in an observational context.