Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This paper examines why party leaders choose primaries in some districts and party elite-driven centralized methods in others. Despite the benefits to party leaders from a centralized procedure, party leaders increasingly turn the decision over to voters and implement primaries as a method to select candidates. I argue that party leaders choose primaries in safe districts where competition for nomination will be high. Party leaders choose to use decentralized methods to avoid defection of unselected candidates. The hypothesis is tested using original data on congressional elections in South Korea from 2012-2020. The findings show that safe districts attract more applicants and confirms the theoretical expectation that parties choose primary elections in safe districts.