Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In recent decades, political polarization in Brazil has centered around support for or opposition to the Workers’ Party (PT). What explains the animosity between petistas and antipetistas, who constitute up to half of Brazil’s electorate? An important source of polarization is partisan stereotyping, a tendency for both supporters and opponents of the PT to misperceive the composition of both their own side’s bases of support as well as their opponents’. We hypothesize that both petistas and antipetistas will considerably overestimate the extent to which supporters and opponents belong to party-stereotypical groups. For example, Brazilians who hold positive and/or negative partisan attitudes should overestimate the percentage of petistas who are poor, people of color, northeasterners, women, and LGBTQ+, and overestimate the percentage of antipetistas who are well-off, older, white men. Voters mischaracterize both their own side as well as the other, but bias in out-group misperception is larger. We further show that misperceptions are correlated with stronger partisan affect, perceptions of greater out-group extremism, and tighter allegiance to the in-group – the core elements of affective polarization.