Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Although we know what an alliance is, who an ally is seems much less clear. Indeed, in the US political lexicon many actors are described as American allies, ranging from NATO members to Israel and Ukraine, to Saudi Arabia and stateless groups such as the Syrian Kurds. Meanwhile, countries like Turkey experience historic levels of public and elite-level skepticism, diminishing their perceptions as longstanding treaty allies. To the extent that public support for war is shaped by alliance relationships as the existing research suggests, how the public thinks about who is and is not an ally becomes critically important for US foreign policy. This project builds on the alliance literature to investigate how the public forms its perceptions of allies. It leverages a conjoint survey experiment to identify the dimensions that the US public prioritizes to decide whether a foreign actor is a US ally. The findings contribute to the alliance literature by testing how the existing explanations of alliance formation shape public perceptions. They also shed light on the more recent debates concerning the factors that help alliances endure.