Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Parties run election campaigns by taking stances on various policy issues. Often however, implementing these policies requires deals with competitors who have different issue stances. Such deals can take two forms: policy compromises on individual issues or logrolls where each party gets to keep its position on one issue while conceding on another one. We study what types of deals voters are willing to accept in these negotiations based on a pre-registered survey experiment conducted after the 2021 Dutch general election. We find no evidence that respondents prefer logroll deals over policy compromises per se. Rather, voters prefer logroll deals to compromises only if the party they voted for is able to secure its position on an issue that also aligns with their voters’ preferences and is highly salient to them. Our results have wider implications for political representation and government formation processes