Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
When do states respond swiftly to nuclear counterproliferation and when do they not? In contrast to diplomatic and economic tools to prevent nuclear proliferation, fewer countries have openly admitted to using counterproliferation tools. However, when they do, the global response is largely limited to verbal condemnation despite the reoccurring violations of international law. The article develops insights into this seemingly reluctant response by third-party states to nuclear counterproliferation attacks (C=~40). Employing process tracing in a most-similar exploratory case design, I consult a variety of rich archival resources including official documents to analyze three cases in depth: Operation Opera, 1980s Iraqi attacks on Iran, and assassinations of Iranian scientists. This work will advance an understanding of international behavior in response to selected military actions. It provides a framework of strategic reasoning for preventive counterproliferation strikes.