Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Estimating externally valid causal effects is a foundational problem in the social sciences. A key assumption in generalizing or transporting causal effects is overlap. However, in practice, having full overlap between an experimental sample and a target population can be challenging, due to feasibility constraints, ethical concerns, or contextual differences between the experiment and the population. In the following paper, we introduce a framework for considering external validity in the presence of overlap violations. The contributions are two-fold. First, the framework allows researchers to partially identify the population average treatment effect under overlap violations. Furthermore, we introduce a method for researchers to perform valid inference over such a set. Second, we introduce summary measures and benchmarking that help researchers consider the plausibility of the overlap violations. Importantly, the paper provides a mathematical framework for researchers to consider different sampling and experimental designs when designing externally valid experiments. The proposed partial identification approach is illustrated on a set of deep canvassing experiments.