Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
What motivates states to ratify human rights treaties after 10, 15, or more years after the treaty opening? In this project, I focus on what I term ‘norm stragglers,’ states that join a norm cascade after the tipping point, and most other states have already ratified the human rights treaty. I explore the determinants of stragglers ratifying the ICCPR and compare motivations with those who joined earlier in the norm life cycle. I argue that straggling states are receptive to targeted shaming, mobilization, and global norm acceptance but take higher thresholds to motivate action. The findings inform our understanding of state commitment with human rights law as well as inform the potential importance of urging states to ratify after years or decades have passed without them doing so.