Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The academic literature on Latin American party systems has emphasized two seemingly disparate realities. Several studies have stressed the personalistic, and clientelist nature of parties as well as the region’s volatile electoral context. Moreover, at the start of this century, widespread dissatisfaction with democracy and the weakening of established political parties opened opportunities for successful populist outsider leaders, reinforcing the sense that party systems in Latin America lacked programmatic structure. Other scholars, however, have argued that ideological and programmatic incoherence have been overblown, demonstrating through analyses of party positions that Latin American party systems have a clearly identifiable ideological structure, especially regarding the economy, and to a lesser extent on socio-cultural issues. In this paper, we argue that both sets of scholars have identified important characteristics of parties in the region. Relying on data regarding party positions across different types of policies and dimensions from the first Chapel Hill Expert Survey on Latin America (CHES-LA) and using confirmatory factor analysis, we show that party competition in Latin America is in fact programmatically structured, but not exclusively so. It is multi-dimensional, with relevant dimensions also of clientelism and populism, with intra-regional variation. In our conclusion we examine the negative implications this has for democratic accountability and meaningful political representation.