Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Why do some sanctions incur major costs, whereas others have a more subdued impact? I argue that the impact of economic sanctions is contingent upon the degree of coordination between sanctioned firms and the target state. Firms that align with the strategic interests of the target state are more likely to receive subsidies and transfers to bail them out from foreign sanctions. I examine this question in the context of the United States’ unprecedented economic sanctions against China. With an original dataset of the universe of US-sanctioned Chinese firms, I employ a difference-in-difference strategy by comparing sanctioned firms to non-sanctioned ones before and after the US sanction. I show that the Chinese state selectively provides more subsidies and government contracts to firms that contribute to China’s policy agenda – promoting strategic sectors for industrial upgrading and military modernization. While existing literature predominately considers sanctions as a one-off game, this paper offers insights into the dynamic interactions among the sender state, the target state, and the target businesses and their impacts on the effectiveness of economic sanctions.