Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
What impact does women’s executive leadership have on state involvement in UN peacekeeping missions? We aim to explore a few common explanations for state commitment to peacekeeping operations, taking leadership into account for the first time. In particular, past literature has focused on state-based explanations that exclude individual leadership from the equation. For example, past research has overly relied on security explanations for committing troops. However, we posit that due to factors such as the political double bind, gendered leadership may matter in this decision calculus. Specifically, we argue that women leaders may be more likely to commit to UN peacekeeping missions that are particularly focused on humanitarian concerns as opposed to strictly security issues. In particular, we place this research in the growing literature on women leaders, the double bind, and foreign policy decision-making.