Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A growing body of scholarship suggests that population size scaling shapes democracy in fundamental ways. However, the electoral benefits of constituency population are mixed. Several studies have shown, on the one hand, that turnout decreases in more population electoral districts, which suggests that smaller districts promote democratic participation and engagement. On the other hand, research shows that elections become more competitive in more population electorates, which implies that larger districts promote democratic contestation. In this paper, I propose a logical model that gives equal weight to electoral competition and participation in order to identify the district population size at which both values are maximized. I fit my model empirically using a dataset on US and Canadian mayoral elections, which includes more than 3000 municipal election results between 2017-2022, with population sizes ranging from 3 to more than 1 million. The results suggest that the balance between participation and contestation is maximized when population is between 1,000 and 10,000. The results have important implications for democracy and democratic reforms.