Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Are international interventions successful at state-building? Existing research is inconclusive and presents contradictory arguments about the effectiveness of state-building projects. I take a fresh look at this debate by focusing on one of the largest but under-studied state-building organization in the world: the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). UNDP provides a crucial test for the power of international interventions: its work with long time horizons, deep financial resources, and broad global presence better situates its projects for success than any organization. Using a new dataset of geolocated UNDP state-building projects and expenditures, I find that UNDP's state-building work is associated with a statistically significant decrease in violence -- overall, by state actors, and by non-state actors. This is consistent with the most optimistic arguments in support of state-building, suggesting that with the right approach international organizations can successfully build states.