Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The deeply divided reactions among Americans toward Critical Race Theory are, to some, a reason to hasten the spread of school choice programs. Others argue that how children learn about race and American history is too important to leave up to individual preferences. This distinction raises questions about whether schools' purpose is to provide a common understanding of what it means to be an American citizen or to provide support for whatever educational experiences parents prefer. This paper describes an MTurk-based survey experiment designed to test whether opponents of CRT would tolerate a political candidate who speaks positively of CRT but believes parents should wield control over the school curriculum. Results showed that when the candidate supported parent choice instead of asserting the school board’s authority on the matter, support increased significantly. Additionally, participants thought that a candidate supporting parent choice would have a better chance of being elected.