Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How do experiences of forced displacement shape political outcomes in displaced communities in the long run? In this paper, we provide a causal answer to this question by exploiting two parallel cases of internal displacement, the forced evacuation of 1.5 million German and French citizens living inside the “Red Zones” along their shared border at the start of World War II. On both sides of the border, civilians were sent to what were considered safer parts of the respective country. In exile, displaced communities faced hardship and "othering", based on their status as linguistic, in the French case, and religious, in the German case, minorities in the respective host areas. They returned after one year of displacement when hostilities temporarily ceased after the German occupation of Paris. Using spatial regression discontinuity designs, we compare voting patterns of localities that were displaced between 1939 and 1940 to directly adjacent localities just outside the Red Zones that were not displaced. We find that displaced communities are 4-5 percentage points more likely to support populist radical right parties in the 2000s. This result holds for both Germany and France.