Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Why do authoritarian regimes leverage online subculture that is inconsistent with mainstream ideology in their own propaganda system? In this paper, I argue that using subculture discourse works as a resource to co-opt the younger generation to increase their regime support. Alternatively, the regime can use subculture discourse to mobilize supporters to make comments in favor of the regime and thus counter the negative impact of criticism. To test these two theories, I conducted a survey experiment including over 2800 respondents, and used content analysis to examining Weibo posts posted by China’s official media between January 2019 and March 2022 as a supplement. The results of survey experiment supported the cooptation proposition rather than the mobilization proposition. Reading subculture-framed propaganda strengthens pro-regime attitudes via emotional triggers. However, it cannot encourage pro-regime behaviors. I conclude that subculture propaganda’s effects are mainly on audiences’ attitudes rather than behaviors.