Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper explores LGBTQ+ populations’ substantive representation in the legislature. Why has there been such a significant shift in the landscape of LGBTQ+ rights in European countries in the last decade? Although the literature on LGBTQ+ populations has developed theories about public opinion on LGBTQ+ policies or policy outcomes for LGBTQ+ populations, I add to the literature by bridging public opinion, political institutions, and policy outcomes. I argue that a positive shift in social construction of LGBTQ+ populations is required for policies that accept LGBTQ+ people's rights. Furthermore, I assert that translating social constructions of LGBTQ+ populations to policy outcomes is mediated by electoral systems due to (1) the chances of LGBTQ+ candidates running and winning, (2) the entry of parties into parliament to actively deal with LGBTQ+ issues (e.g., green parties and social democratic parties) and or at least not to oppose LGBTQ friendly bills (e.g., non-religious central-right parties). I examine the theory by TSCS data of 24 European advanced democracies from 2009 to 2021.