Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Right-wing populist (RWP) parties are gaining popularity at the same time as the climate crisis is escalating. Scholars have studied RWP parties’ positions on climate change and RWP supporters’ opposition to climate policy. Yet, little is known about the effect of RWP rhetoric about climate change on individual opposition to climate policy. Individuals can reject climate policy if the latter puts a strain on individuals’ economic conditions via threat to employment with the closure of carbon intensive or increased living costs with carbon tax (e.g. the economic dimension) and/or if they see the climate agenda as being espoused by a liberal, cosmopolitan elite (e.g. the cultural dimension). This paper investigates these two dimensions using a survey experiment conducted in the United Kingdom (UK). We draw on framings actually used by real right-wing figures prominent in the UK debate, either blaming climate policy for the cost-of-living crisis or casting climate policy as the ideological project of progressive urbanites. This experiment would help us make causal inferences about what drives individuals to oppose climate policies, and how they express that opposition.