Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

The Impact of Decision-Maker Attributes on International Security

Sat, September 2, 4:00 to 5:30pm PDT (4:00 to 5:30pm PDT), LACC, 502B

Session Submission Type: Full Paper Panel

Session Description

Foreign policy is made by individuals, making it important to understand the role of individual-level factors in shaping foreign policy decision-making. The papers on this panel examine how personality, psychology, and bureaucratic politics impact foreign policy decision-making and international diplomacy in international security contexts. Jost, Kertzer, Min, and Schub analyze the effect of an advisor's personal traits on their sway over foreign policy with the aid of a new dataset of recommendations made during foreign policy deliberations with the U.S. President from 1947 to 1988. Holmes and Kaplow investigate the role of psychological trust in determining uncertainty over a signal sender’s identity and its impacts on international diplomacy. Aoki scrutinizes how “negativity bias” impacts the perceptions of both experts and non-experts in government when evaluating an adversary’s intentions. Harden provides an investigation of the connection between presidential narcissism and the likelihood of issuing a public statement and finds that presidents with a high level of narcissism are less likely to issue public statements of resolve. Lastly, Sendinc offers a novel theory of leader narcissism and status dissatisfaction and shows that individuals with a high degree of narcissism are more likely to possess status dissatisfaction and are more likely to take part in conflict to increase their status.

Sub Unit

Individual Presentations

Chair

Discussants