Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Created Panel
The third panel analyzes the politics of property rights and redistribution. Barham analyzes how the military facilitated landed elites’ resistance to land redistribution in 1930s Mexico. Urteaga investigates the politics of agricultural policymaking in Chile and Colombia during the era of import substitution industrialization, seeking to explain why Chile’s development strategy was more biased against agriculture than Colombia’s. Paniagua uses evidence from Argentina to that portfolio diversification accounts for elite decisions to invest in different strategies around redistribution. Mangonnet shows that the exogenous abolition of labor-repressive arrangements (e.g., slavery) in Imperial Brazil fostered the emergence of private property rights as a legal means to control labor and preclude freed workers from having land access.
How the Military Facilitated Elite Backlash to Redistribution - Elena Barham, Columbia University
Fighting Urban Bias - Madai Urteaga Quispe, Harvard University
Abolitionism and Property Rights Formation - Jorge G Mangonnet, Vanderbilt University
Protecting Land in Courtrooms: Elites and Judicial Behavior in Colombia - Laura Garcia Montoya, University of Toronto; ANA MARIA MONTOYA GARCIA, Duke University; Isabel Güiza-Gómez, The University of Notre Dame